Each “Analyze a quarrel” essay is likely to be scored on a 6-point holistic scale according to your criteria below.

Each “Analyze a quarrel” essay is likely to be scored on a 6-point holistic scale according to your criteria below.

Each “Analyze a quarrel” essay is likely to be scored on a 6-point holistic scale according to your criteria below.

A single combined score is reported because it is more reliable than either task score alone although the GRE ® Analytical Writing measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks. The score reported will represent the common regarding the scores when it comes to two tasks.

Score of 6 Outstanding

A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique regarding the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.

A typical paper in this category:

  • clearly identifies important https://essaywritersite.com/buy-essay-online popular features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
  • develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically and connects these with clear transitions
  • effectively supports the main points for the critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility aided by the conventions (in other words., grammar, usage and mechanics) of standard written English but might have minor errors

Score of 5 Strong

A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique associated with the argument and conveys meaning clearly.

A paper that is typical this category:

  • clearly identifies important attributes of the argument and analyzes them in a generally perceptive way
  • develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically and connects them with appropriate transitions
  • sensibly supports the main points associated with critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility aided by the conventions of standard written English, but might have errors that are minor

Score of 4 Adequate

A 4 paper presents a competent critique associated with the argument and conveys meaning adequately.

A paper that is typical this category:

  • identifies and analyzes important options that come with the argument
  • develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily, but may not connect all of them with transitions
  • supports the main points regarding the critique
  • demonstrates sufficient control of language to state ideas with reasonable clarity
  • generally demonstrates control over the conventions of standard written English, but may have some errors

Score of 3 Limited

A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its critique for the argument and in conveying meaning, but is obviously flawed.

A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more associated with the following characteristics:

  • does not identify or analyze all the important popular features of the argument, even though some analysis of this argument is present
  • mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
  • is restricted into the logical development and organization of ideas
  • Offers support of little value and relevance for points for the critique
  • lacks clarity in expressing ideas
  • contains occasional errors that are major frequent minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that may interfere with meaning

Score of 2 Seriously Flawed

A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.

A typical paper in this category exhibits more than one of this following characteristics:

  • will not present a critique predicated on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own views on the subject
  • does not develop ideas or is disorganized and illogical
  • provides little if any relevant or reasonable support
  • has serious problems in the employment of language and in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
  • contains serious errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that frequently meaning that is obscure

Score of 1 Fundamentally Deficient

A 1 paper demonstrates deficiencies that are fundamental analytical writing.

A typical paper in this category exhibits a number of associated with the following characteristics:

  • provides little if any evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the argument
  • provides little if any proof of the capacity to develop an organized response
  • Has problems that are severe language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
  • Contains errors that are pervasive grammar, usage or mechanics that result in incoherence

Leave a comment